11/23/2023 0 Comments Davinci resolve export mp4![]() I'm using Affinity Photo/Designer's batch processor now to convert the TIFF-files to PNG. It's just that other factors play an important role. And they can have much different requirements, while still being professional and top notch in their field. Professional video software isn't only used for broadcasting anymore, but also for all kinds of professional online purposes. And I also feel you when you say it's best that Davinci doesn't concern more output formats that much for the same reasons you described. ![]() I agree with you though that there are more important things to fix and add in Resolve than this. With use cases and usages that can be a lot different. But understand there's also a different reality for many day to day projects in other fields. And I get it that it would be best to store things in the highest possible way when doing everything best way possible. That said, I completely understand your points from other perspectives and thinking about other use cases. for many projects, because, they only fill up harddrive/ssd space. Way better than uncompressed files and files with huge color spaces, multiple channels etc. Neither isn't a PNG image sequence the end product, although it could be.įor instance I could use it to export to animation software, 3D software, software used to build interactive and game stuff online etc.Īlso a PNG sequence is a fine way to archive an animation for instance. ![]() Not exactly sure what your point is exactly, but PNG is not low quality. This is the reason why I wrote about EXR and Prores like formats : I'm pretty sure a huge % of users are yet satisfied with transpacency outputformats at this point, which actually doesn't mean png must not be supported but rather that this is the reason why you don't see much posts as yours on this topic even though it would be great it was a mess for months when silicon macs couldn't import PR4444 with alpha), and BTW imho, the way it's sometimes treated in Resolve is weird with some files (though it goes better, the alpha output trick in color on some yet premultiplied files was cumbersome). Now specifically about transparency : this is what's at stake, yes, and this is a huge issue when it fails, (for ex. In the same field, I noticed that many Resolve users including me are focused on other topics, so that this format export is not a real stake anymore : even for MP4s I don't rely on Resolve, why would I for a png sequence ? I confess I prefer Resolve to do a great job in the range it is expected to than do a lot of things in lower quality (if we have the choice). Look, even if a project is to be sent on YT, I export a Prores and then Handbrake it to mp4 (or event send the prores, bandwidths are made for that), this is the reason why I wrote about it this way. It was just all about the % of WF which absolutely needs it in Resolve (I take the opportunity here to repeat I'd be glad too it would be available inside Resolve though). Consequently I didn't want to understate the format itself, just for you to be aware. Just a word about my own little input above : I'm fully aware of the use of png in sequences too, AND I'm using 3D softwares too sometimes. ![]() Thanks for your reactions and hopefully Blackmagic will include PNG one day. Thanks for the workaround on the fusion tab and a great tip for huge video's to not having to convert files after rendering, but for the things I do it's not a very quick and easy workflow for the way smaller projects I do and I don't feel like wanting to set that up every time in each project. Many final projects these days go to youtube or websites making high standard formats with the best of the best color spaces way overkill and inefficient that only fill up hard drive space.Īnd Davinci acknoledges that because it also offers formats like mp4. Next to this not each and every project needs to be in prores and top of the class quality. Many programs these days work with PNG as input and it's a great format because of the lossless compression and (semi) transparancy. Sure we can discuss why we want to use a particular much used standard format and which format you like better, but in reality we're working with different types of software and jobs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |